Quantifying Antiquity Integrated Constructibility Model (ICM)
Analysis Subject: The Great Pyramid of Giza
Quantifying Antiquity's ICM is a transparent engineering model developed to evaluate competing construction scenarios for the Great Pyramid of Giza using published evidence and documented assumptions. Rather than illustrating theories, it quantitatively tests whether those scenarios remain internally consistent when all engineering, logistical, material, and demographic dependencies are evaluated together as a complete system.
Explore the conventional construction model of the Great Pyramid. Change one or more assumptions and run the model to see how those changes affect the results. Every scenario is evaluated using the same integrated calculations, so you can compare different assumptions on equal terms.
The baseline values represent the model's documented starting scenario. Leave them unchanged to reproduce the baseline, or adjust them to test how alternative assumptions affect labor, logistics, resources, and closure.
Change the story, watch the math, and review each scenario's results in detail below.
Scenario Summary
The model does not close.
Under the assumptions you set, the kingdom cannot carry the project's full burden, and the population cannot keep supplying and replacing the workforce it needs — so the project does not close.
This scenario leaves every assumption at its baseline value, so all results match the baseline scenario. National Closure and Demographic Closure keep their baseline verdicts: the model does not close.
Why — both labor tests must hold, and they are not the only requirement
Can the civilization sustain the project's total labor, agricultural, material, logistical, and support burden while still carrying on its other necessary functions?
Unchanged — this test does not close: above the 25% single-project mobilization threshold (workbook status: "EXCEEDS SINGLE-PROJECT MOBILIZATION CEILING").
Can the population repeatedly supply and replace the workers the project needs across the full construction period — covering attrition, aging out, and cohort replacement?
Unchanged — this test does not close: sustained mobilization stands at the scale of the kingdom's maximum documented capacity, and is held continuously rather than levied once (workbook status: "DOES NOT CLOSE - SUSTAINED MOBILIZATION AT THE SCALE OF MAXIMUM DOCUMENTED CAPACITY, HELD CONTINUOUSLY").
Would more workers fix it? Not necessarily. Every additional worker must also be fed, housed, moved, and supported, so more workers enlarge the support population and the food, materials, and logistics the kingdom must supply. Past a point, added labor grows the very burden national closure measures faster than it closes the gap — which is why raising the workforce alone need not produce closure.
Labor and demographic closure are necessary, not sufficient. The construction explanation must also clear the separately governed material, settlement, and capability findings: timber throughput and supply, rope and fiber production, copper supply, settlement capacity, granite ground bearing, granite loading stability, and granite restraint and refloating. A scenario that improves the labor percentage does not alter timber, rope, copper, settlement, ground-bearing, or vessel-stability requirements unless it changes the inputs governing those findings.
- Scenario Assumptions
-
- No assumptions were changed; this is the baseline scenario.
- Propagated Changes
-
- No registered closure output changed.
- Unchanged Results
-
- Total project-dependent population — these assumptions do not reduce the number of people the project commits
- National mobilization test
- Demographic closure verdict
Numerical outcomes, human burden, and evidence compatibility are separate assessments; a numerical result never implies historical support. Exact values, workbook references, and provenance remain in the technical sections below.
Scenario Details
Scenario Assessment
- Numerical result
- 0 of 155 outputs changed under this scenario. Individual test outcomes appear in Closure Results; each is a single numerical test against one documented threshold.
- Total project-dependent population
- 533233.8571428572 baseline → 533233.8571428572 under this scenario (Model_04!B134); the full breakdown is in the Human Burden table under Scenario Effects.
- Evidence compatibility
- Supported
- Overall assessment
- Not available. A scenario can close numerically while relying on unsupported or unsustainable input assumptions. Numerical test outcomes and evidence compatibility are reported separately and are not combined into a credibility claim: supported input ranges are registered for only one lever (build duration), and no aggregate compatibility measure is defined.
Available Scenarios
Baseline Scenario
Scenario description
Runs the model with every assumption left at its baseline value.
Compatibility Notes
What the scenario validator recorded for the current scenario's inputs.
- No compatibility findings were recorded for this scenario.
Download Scenario
Exports this scenario with its inputs, results, explanation, source provenance and workbook identity, plus a .sha256 sidecar. Two files are saved.
Scenario digest 3d8651eb4861e54c0f3354eceb6bcd3046b5f7748456f56a982ccfa3fc5b89c7
The digest is reproducible: re-running the same inputs on this model produces it again. It is not proof of origin — the receipt and its hash are generated without a secret, so a matching pair shows two files agree, not where either came from.
Closure Results
Technical detail — expand for tables, workbook references, and exact values
The workbook's closure-test outcomes, recomputed under the current scenario. Each status is a single numerical test against one documented threshold - not an overall credibility or sustainability verdict. Evidence compatibility of the scenario's inputs is assessed separately in Scenario Details.
National Closure
| Measure | Output type | Baseline value | Current scenario value | Change status | Workbook reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| National mobilization test | Status | EXCEEDS SINGLE-PROJECT MOBILIZATION CEILING | EXCEEDS SINGLE-PROJECT MOBILIZATION CEILING | Unchanged | NationalClosure_41!B14 |
| Project labor as share of the NON-FARM male labor pool | Metric | 0.6164306640625001 | 0.6164306640625001 | Unchanged | NationalClosure_41!B13 |
Demographic Closure
| Measure | Output type | Baseline value | Current scenario value | Change status | Workbook reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Documented mobilization limit test | Status | APPROACHING THE MAXIMUM DOCUMENTED MOBILIZATION - AND HELD CONTINUOUSLY RATHER THAN LEVIED ONCE | APPROACHING THE MAXIMUM DOCUMENTED MOBILIZATION - AND HELD CONTINUOUSLY RATHER THAN LEVIED ONCE | Unchanged | DemographicClosure_46!B35 |
| Demographic closure verdict | Conclusion | DOES NOT CLOSE - SUSTAINED MOBILIZATION AT THE SCALE OF MAXIMUM DOCUMENTED CAPACITY, HELD CONTINUOUSLY | DOES NOT CLOSE - SUSTAINED MOBILIZATION AT THE SCALE OF MAXIMUM DOCUMENTED CAPACITY, HELD CONTINUOUSLY | Unchanged | DemographicClosure_46!B38 |
| Project workforce vs. Weni mobilization maximum — concurrent | Metric | 0.9468375 | 0.9468375 | Unchanged | DemographicClosure_46!B32 |
| Project workforce vs. Weni mobilization maximum — rostered | Metric | 1.0821 | 1.0821 | Unchanged | DemographicClosure_46!B33 |
Constructability Subsystems
Every engineering subsystem is held to the same architecture: baseline vs scenario values, workbook traceability, propagated results, and — where the workbook defines one — a closure test. Each panel states honestly how far that reaches today; readiness is a recorded migration fact, not a score.
National Closure
Evaluated closure testFully migrated: the Test 1 metric and status recompute under every scenario with workbook traceability.
Evaluated in the closure tables above; scenario movement appears in the Scenario Summary.
Workbook test: NationalClosure_41!B14 against the 25% single-project mobilization threshold.
Demographic Closure
Evaluated closure testFully migrated: the Weni-maximum metrics, Test C status, and closure verdict recompute under every scenario.
Evaluated in the closure tables above; scenario movement appears in the Scenario Summary.
Workbook test: DemographicClosure_46!B38 against the maximum documented mobilization record.
Timber
Migrated — propagates, no closure test yetThe TimberLabor_40 labor chain and BargeTimber_43 hull-timber feed are migrated, emitted with workbook traceability, and recompute under scenarios (build duration reaches them).
Missing before this becomes an evaluated closure section: No workbook closure test exists for timber. The off-site labor chain that carries timber labor into the total project-dedicated population enters Model_04!B134 through the sourced constant Model_04!D133, so recomputed timber labor does not yet feed back into the closure totals. TimberSystem_31 (stock/replacement) and IERRampTimber_38 are not migrated; TimberLabor_40!B6 consumes IERRampTimber_38!B31 as a sourced value. No timber-specific scenario levers are registered.
The workbook itself gates TimberSystem_31 as diagnostic-only (SRC-METHOD-TIMBER-DIAG; readiness review rejected M3 integration pending OPEN-TIMBER-* items), so a timber closure test would first have to exist in the workbook.
| Measure | Baseline value | Scenario value | Change status | Why it changed | Workbook reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOTAL TIMBER PER YEAR | 4130.476955143621 | 4130.476955143621 | Unchanged | TimberLabor_40!B7 | |
| Barge hull timber, felled (Wave 5 feed) - native acacia, yard-built | 80.64869603331141 | 80.64869603331141 | Unchanged | TimberLabor_40!B8 | |
| Subtotal, direct timber labor | 819 | 819 | Unchanged | TimberLabor_40!B16 | |
| Standing acacia felled (incl. conversion waste) | 1129.0817444663596 | 1129.0817444663596 | Unchanged | BargeTimber_43!B19 |
Copper & Resource Consumption
Not migrated — labels onlyCopper appears only as labor headcount lines (Model_04!B129, WorkforceLedger_05!D14) inside sourced constants; their labels are preserved.
Missing before this becomes an evaluated closure section: The copper computation chain is not migrated: no engine module derives mine/smelt/transport labor, no demand figure is computed, and no comparison against the Bir Nasib output ceiling (SRC-BIRNASIB, 5,000-5,500 t all-time) exists anywhere in the engine. Fuel/woodland coupling for smelting is likewise unmigrated.
SRC-BIRNASIB carries the documented ceiling; the workbook's copper-chain rows live in Model_04 and would need dedicated module migration before any copper closure claim.
Scenario Effects
Technical detail — expand for tables, workbook references, and exact values
Scenario Analysis Detail
- Scenario analysis status
- Completed successfully
- Model integrity
- Validated
- Assumptions changed
- 0
- Changed-output count
- 0
- Unchanged-output count
- 155
- Total outputs evaluated
- 155
Changed Inputs
| Label | Baseline value | Scenario value | Change status | Unit |
|---|
Human Burden
The people this scenario commits, as the workbook's own outputs report them. Direct workers are only part of the commitment: the total project-dependent population includes the support population required to feed and sustain them.
| Measure | Baseline value | Current scenario value | Change status | Workbook reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct standing workforce (concurrent) | ||||
| Project standing mobilization (concurrent) | 47341.875 | 47341.875 | Unchanged | DemographicClosure_46!B31 |
| Rostered project workforce | ||||
| On-site rostered total | 47316 | 47316 | Unchanged | WorkforceLedger_05!C18 |
| Off-site dedicated labor, rostered | 49613 | 49613 | Unchanged | WorkforceLedger_05!C20 |
| Project-dedicated LABOR (rostered, all depts) | 100455.0 | 100455.0 | Unchanged | NationalClosure_41!B7 |
| Support population sustaining the project | ||||
| Feedback-solved food support population | Rostered labor | FoodFeedback_28 | 261803.70374236684 | 261803.70374236684 | Unchanged | DiagnosticIntegration_35!E5 |
| Total project-dependent population | ||||
| TOTAL PROJECT-DEDICATED POPULATION | 533233.8571428572 | 533233.8571428572 | Unchanged | Model_04!B134 |
| Population shares in the closure tests | ||||
| Project labor as share of the NON-FARM male labor pool | 0.6164306640625001 | 0.6164306640625001 | Unchanged | NationalClosure_41!B13 |
| Project workforce vs. Weni mobilization maximum — concurrent | 0.9468375 | 0.9468375 | Unchanged | DemographicClosure_46!B32 |
| Project workforce vs. Weni mobilization maximum — rostered | 1.0821 | 1.0821 | Unchanged | DemographicClosure_46!B33 |
Changed Closure Outputs
Numerical recomputation only: these values show how the registered closure outputs move under the scenario's inputs. Whether those inputs are evidence-supported is reported separately in Scenario Details.
- Changed closure-output count
- 0
| Measure | Baseline value | Scenario value | Why it changed | Workbook reference |
|---|
Evidence Identity
Technical detail — expand for tables, workbook references, and exact values
Evidence Header
- Workbook version
- v0.92
- Baseline tag
- v0.64-baseline
Evidence Details
- Workbook SHA-256
- 4c7191452c0f8bd9c8ade1259e52f53b7b52817d69dd624c0b1c53ea7981580e
Workbook Findings
Technical detail — expand for tables, workbook references, and exact values
Workbook Findings
All 155 outputs computed by the engine, grouped by domain. Labels are preserved from the workbook. Expand a domain to inspect the individual results.
Workforce & Population (12)
| Label | Baseline value | Current scenario value | Change status | Workbook reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Share of adjusted effective labor pool | 0.24761904761904763 | 0.24761904761904763 | Unchanged | Model_04!B12 |
| Share of adjusted effective labor pool | 0.9142857142857143 | 0.9142857142857143 | Unchanged | Model_04!C12 |
| Share of adjusted effective labor pool | 1.2 | 1.2 | Unchanged | Model_04!D12 |
| TOTAL PROJECT-DEDICATED POPULATION | 533233.8571428572 | 533233.8571428572 | Unchanged | Model_04!B134 |
| River/harbor corridor [Wave 6, bodies only] | 743.0 | 743.0 | Unchanged | Model_04!B135 |
| Domestic/process water included through WaterFeedback_21 | FoodSystem_13 capacity check | PASS / lower-bound | OPEN / lower-bound | Millers / bakers / brewers | PASS | PASS | Unchanged | PersonCategoryMatrix_22!J17 |
| REQUIRED SUPPORT SUBTOTAL | 25299 | 25299 | Unchanged | VillageSufficiency_39!B11 |
| Grain transport | 150 | 150 | Unchanged | WorkforceLedger_05!C16 |
| On-site rostered total | 47316 | 47316 | Unchanged | WorkforceLedger_05!C18 |
| Off-site dedicated labor, rostered | 49613 | 49613 | Unchanged | WorkforceLedger_05!C20 |
| Off-site dedicated labor, rostered | 12360 | 12360 | Unchanged | WorkforceLedger_05!D20 |
| Total project-dedicated population | 533233.8571428572 | 533233.8571428572 | Unchanged | WorkforceLedger_05!C21 |
Closure Results (76)
| Label | Baseline value | Current scenario value | Change status | Workbook reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current partial project-dedicated population | Required to close | 281642.85714285716 | 281642.85714285716 | Unchanged | ClosureRequirements_15!B5 |
| Share of high-end 1.6M Old Kingdom population | Required to close | 0.17602678571428573 | 0.17602678571428573 | Unchanged | ClosureRequirements_15!B6 |
| Current model vs 150k screen | 150,000 project-dedicated people | 1.8776190476190477 | 1.8776190476190477 | Unchanged | ClosureRequirements_15!B8 |
| Share of 1.6M kingdom | 0.03125 | 0.03125 | Unchanged | ClosureRequirements_15!B15 |
| Share of 1.6M kingdom | 0.046875 | 0.046875 | Unchanged | ClosureRequirements_15!B16 |
| ClosureRequirements_15!B17 | 0.0625 | 0.0625 | Unchanged | ClosureRequirements_15!B17 |
| ClosureRequirements_15!B18 | 0.078125 | 0.078125 | Unchanged | ClosureRequirements_15!B18 |
| ClosureRequirements_15!B19 | 0.09375 | 0.09375 | Unchanged | ClosureRequirements_15!B19 |
| ClosureRequirements_15!B20 | 0.125 | 0.125 | Unchanged | ClosureRequirements_15!B20 |
| Project rostered labor excl. annual-yield farmers (live) | 47341.875 | 47341.875 | Unchanged | ClosureSensitivity_45!B4 |
| ClosureSensitivity_45!B9 | 0.9862890624999998 | 0.9862890624999998 | Unchanged | ClosureSensitivity_45!B9 |
| ClosureSensitivity_45!C9 | 0.7397167968750001 | 0.7397167968750001 | Unchanged | ClosureSensitivity_45!C9 |
| ClosureSensitivity_45!B10 | 0.8966264204545453 | 0.8966264204545453 | Unchanged | ClosureSensitivity_45!B10 |
| ClosureSensitivity_45!C10 | 0.6724698153409092 | 0.6724698153409092 | Unchanged | ClosureSensitivity_45!C10 |
| ClosureSensitivity_45!D10 | 0.5379758522727273 | 0.5379758522727273 | Unchanged | ClosureSensitivity_45!D10 |
| ClosureSensitivity_45!B11 | 0.8219075520833332 | 0.8219075520833332 | Unchanged | ClosureSensitivity_45!B11 |
| ClosureSensitivity_45!C11 | 0.6164306640625001 | 0.6164306640625001 | Unchanged | ClosureSensitivity_45!C11 |
| ClosureSensitivity_45!D11 | 0.49314453125 | 0.49314453125 | Unchanged | ClosureSensitivity_45!D11 |
| ClosureSensitivity_45!B12 | 0.7586838942307691 | 0.7586838942307691 | Unchanged | ClosureSensitivity_45!B12 |
| ClosureSensitivity_45!C12 | 0.5690129206730771 | 0.5690129206730771 | Unchanged | ClosureSensitivity_45!C12 |
| ClosureSensitivity_45!D12 | 0.45521033653846155 | 0.45521033653846155 | Unchanged | ClosureSensitivity_45!D12 |
| ClosureSensitivity_45!B13 | 0.7044921874999999 | 0.7044921874999999 | Unchanged | ClosureSensitivity_45!B13 |
| ClosureSensitivity_45!C13 | 0.5283691406250001 | 0.5283691406250001 | Unchanged | ClosureSensitivity_45!C13 |
| ClosureSensitivity_45!D13 | 0.4226953124999999 | 0.4226953124999999 | Unchanged | ClosureSensitivity_45!D13 |
| ClosureSensitivity_45!B14 | 0.6575260416666665 | 0.6575260416666665 | Unchanged | ClosureSensitivity_45!B14 |
| ClosureSensitivity_45!C14 | 0.4931445312500001 | 0.4931445312500001 | Unchanged | ClosureSensitivity_45!C14 |
| ClosureSensitivity_45!D14 | 0.394515625 | 0.394515625 | Unchanged | ClosureSensitivity_45!D14 |
| ClosureSensitivity_45!B18 | 0.7890312499999999 | 0.7890312499999999 | Unchanged | ClosureSensitivity_45!B18 |
| ClosureSensitivity_45!C18 | 0.5917734375000001 | 0.5917734375000001 | Unchanged | ClosureSensitivity_45!C18 |
| ClosureSensitivity_45!B19 | 0.7173011363636362 | 0.7173011363636362 | Unchanged | ClosureSensitivity_45!B19 |
| ClosureSensitivity_45!C19 | 0.5379758522727274 | 0.5379758522727274 | Unchanged | ClosureSensitivity_45!C19 |
| ClosureSensitivity_45!B20 | 0.6575260416666665 | 0.6575260416666665 | Unchanged | ClosureSensitivity_45!B20 |
| ClosureSensitivity_45!C20 | 0.4931445312500001 | 0.4931445312500001 | Unchanged | ClosureSensitivity_45!C20 |
| DEMOGRAPHIC CLOSURE - SUSTAINED MOBILIZATION VS DOCUMENTED CAPACITY: can the kingdom survive the commitment? | DEMOGRAPHIC CLOSURE - SUSTAINED MOBILIZATION VS DOCUMENTED CAPACITY: can the kingdom survive the commitment? | DEMOGRAPHIC CLOSURE - SUSTAINED MOBILIZATION VS DOCUMENTED CAPACITY: can the kingdom survive the commitment? | Unchanged | DemographicClosure_46!A1 |
| Old Kingdom population (Butzer anchor) | 1600000 | 1600000 | Unchanged | DemographicClosure_46!B5 |
| Prime-age male cohort | 384000.0 | 384000.0 | Unchanged | DemographicClosure_46!B6 |
| Ex-farmer Test 1 labor (rostered) | 54105.0 | 54105.0 | Unchanged | DemographicClosure_46!B7 |
| Median working span (death - entry) | 17.5 | 17.5 | Unchanged | DemographicClosure_46!B8 |
| Replacement multiplier (mortality only) | 1.1428571428571428 | 1.1428571428571428 | Unchanged | DemographicClosure_46!B9 |
| Build duration (live model lever) | 20 | 20 | Unchanged | DemographicClosure_46!B10 |
| Concurrent standing roster | 47341.875 | 47341.875 | Unchanged | DemographicClosure_46!B11 |
| Standing share of prime-age cohort (concurrent) | 0.1232861328125 | 0.1232861328125 | Unchanged | DemographicClosure_46!B14 |
| Rostered share of prime-age cohort | 0.1408984375 | 0.1408984375 | Unchanged | DemographicClosure_46!B15 |
| Cross-reference: ex-farmer share of non-farm pool | 0.6164306640625001 | 0.6164306640625001 | Unchanged | DemographicClosure_46!B16 |
| Cumulative distinct men over build | 54105.0 | 54105.0 | Unchanged | DemographicClosure_46!B19 |
| Mortality replacements consumed over build | 6763.125 | 6763.125 | Unchanged | DemographicClosure_46!B20 |
| Sensitivity: cumulative distinct men, 30-yr build | 81157.5 | 81157.5 | Unchanged | DemographicClosure_46!B21 |
| Sensitivity: replacements consumed, 30-yr build | 33815.625 | 33815.625 | Unchanged | DemographicClosure_46!B22 |
| Annual project intake of fresh prime-age males | 2705.25 | 2705.25 | Unchanged | DemographicClosure_46!B23 |
| Annual maturing male cohort, kingdom-wide | 21942.85714285714 | 21942.85714285714 | Unchanged | DemographicClosure_46!B24 |
| Project share of every maturing male cohort | 0.1232861328125 | 0.1232861328125 | Unchanged | DemographicClosure_46!B25 |
| Reading | ONE IN EIGHT OF EVERY MATURING MALE COHORT, NATIONALLY, EVERY YEAR, FOR THE WHOLE BUILD - FOR ONE MONUMENT'S NON-FARM DEPARTMENTS ALONE | ONE IN EIGHT OF EVERY MATURING MALE COHORT, NATIONALLY, EVERY YEAR, FOR THE WHOLE BUILD - FOR ONE MONUMENT'S NON-FARM DEPARTMENTS ALONE | Unchanged | DemographicClosure_46!B26 |
| Maximum documented OK mobilization (Weni levy) | 50000 | 50000 | Unchanged | DemographicClosure_46!B29 |
| Character of Weni levy | EPISODIC - NATIONAL EMERGENCY POSTURE, KINGDOM-WIDE + FOREIGN AUXILIARIES, DISBANDED AFTER EACH CAMPAIGN | EPISODIC - NATIONAL EMERGENCY POSTURE, KINGDOM-WIDE + FOREIGN AUXILIARIES, DISBANDED AFTER EACH CAMPAIGN | Unchanged | DemographicClosure_46!B30 |
| Project standing mobilization (concurrent) | 47341.875 | 47341.875 | Unchanged | DemographicClosure_46!B31 |
| Project workforce vs. Weni mobilization maximum — concurrent | 0.9468375 | 0.9468375 | Unchanged | DemographicClosure_46!B32 |
| Project workforce vs. Weni mobilization maximum — rostered | 1.0821 | 1.0821 | Unchanged | DemographicClosure_46!B33 |
| Character of project mobilization | CONTINUOUS FOR 20-30 YEARS - DOMESTIC NON-FARM POOL ONLY - ARMY MUST STILL EXIST ON TOP | CONTINUOUS FOR 20-30 YEARS - DOMESTIC NON-FARM POOL ONLY - ARMY MUST STILL EXIST ON TOP | Unchanged | DemographicClosure_46!B34 |
| Documented mobilization limit test | APPROACHING THE MAXIMUM DOCUMENTED MOBILIZATION - AND HELD CONTINUOUSLY RATHER THAN LEVIED ONCE | APPROACHING THE MAXIMUM DOCUMENTED MOBILIZATION - AND HELD CONTINUOUSLY RATHER THAN LEVIED ONCE | Unchanged | DemographicClosure_46!B35 |
| Demographic closure verdict | DOES NOT CLOSE - SUSTAINED MOBILIZATION AT THE SCALE OF MAXIMUM DOCUMENTED CAPACITY, HELD CONTINUOUSLY | DOES NOT CLOSE - SUSTAINED MOBILIZATION AT THE SCALE OF MAXIMUM DOCUMENTED CAPACITY, HELD CONTINUOUSLY | Unchanged | DemographicClosure_46!B38 |
| Summary | The conventional model requires the kingdom to hold mobilization at the scale of its maximum documented emergency levy as a permanent 20-30 year baseline, consuming one in every 8 maturing males, before the army, temples, trade, administration, or any other major state construction program receives any labor. Weni's levy was raised once and disbanded; this one cannot be. | The conventional model requires the kingdom to hold mobilization at the scale of its maximum documented emergency levy as a permanent 20-30 year baseline, consuming one in every 8 maturing males, before the army, temples, trade, administration, or any other major state construction program receives any labor. Weni's levy was raised once and disbanded; this one cannot be. | Unchanged | DemographicClosure_46!B39 |
| Scope rule | CONTROL/VERDICT LAYER ONLY - THIS SHEET DOES NOT ADD BURDEN TO M3 | CONTROL/VERDICT LAYER ONLY - THIS SHEET DOES NOT ADD BURDEN TO M3 | Unchanged | DemographicClosure_46!B41 |
| Source caveats (flagged once, both generous) | Weni is 6th Dynasty, ~200 years after Khufu (later, larger state sets the ceiling HIGHER); the figure is rhetorical and read at maximum (a higher Weni makes the pyramid look easier). Palermo Stone (Snefru: 7,000 Nubian captives, 200,000 cattle) confirms the expeditionary-levy character of the OK military - temporary levies, no professional standing army. | Weni is 6th Dynasty, ~200 years after Khufu (later, larger state sets the ceiling HIGHER); the figure is rhetorical and read at maximum (a higher Weni makes the pyramid look easier). Palermo Stone (Snefru: 7,000 Nubian captives, 200,000 cattle) confirms the expeditionary-levy character of the OK military - temporary levies, no professional standing army. | Unchanged | DemographicClosure_46!B43 |
| Share of kingdom | 0.33327116071428575 | 0.33327116071428575 | Unchanged | KingdomCapacity_17!B16 |
| Share of kingdom | Manual source input from SRC-BUTZER-POP | 0.33327116071428575 | 0.33327116071428575 | Unchanged | KingdomCapacity_17!C16 |
| Current model / 150k screen | Between 300,000 and 500,000 bands | 3.554892380952381 | 3.554892380952381 | Unchanged | KingdomCapacity_17!B18 |
| Current model / 150k screen | Capacity-band table below | 3.554892380952381 | 3.554892380952381 | Unchanged | KingdomCapacity_17!C18 |
| Excess above 150k screen | Between 300,000 and 500,000 bands | 383233.85714285716 | 383233.85714285716 | Unchanged | KingdomCapacity_17!B19 |
| Excess above 150k screen | Capacity-band table below | 383233.85714285716 | 383233.85714285716 | Unchanged | KingdomCapacity_17!C19 |
| Project-dedicated LABOR (rostered, all depts) | 100455.0 | 100455.0 | Unchanged | NationalClosure_41!B7 |
| Project-dedicated labor EXCLUDING annual-yield farmers (domestic, after imported-labor lever) | 54105.0 | 54105.0 | Unchanged | NationalClosure_41!B8 |
| Project labor as share of the prime-age male cohort | 0.1408984375 | 0.1408984375 | Unchanged | NationalClosure_41!B12 |
| Project labor as share of the NON-FARM male labor pool | 0.6164306640625001 | 0.6164306640625001 | Unchanged | NationalClosure_41!B13 |
| National mobilization test | EXCEEDS SINGLE-PROJECT MOBILIZATION CEILING | EXCEEDS SINGLE-PROJECT MOBILIZATION CEILING | Unchanged | NationalClosure_41!B14 |
| Farm surplus share (lever) | 0.25 | 0.25 | Unchanged | NationalClosure_41!B18 |
| Non-farm male labor share | 0.6164306640625001 | 0.6164306640625001 | Unchanged | NationalClosure_41!B25 |
Food System (6)
| Label | Baseline value | Current scenario value | Change status | Workbook reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net surplus per active farmer after own household support | 0.3252525252525249 | 0.3252525252525249 | Unchanged | FoodFeedback_28!B46 |
| Total project-dedicated population if food loop passes | 1603796.9070890173 | 1603796.9070890173 | Unchanged | FoodFeedback_28!B54 |
| Required output per active farmer to preserve current farm net surplus share | Live value | 1.9663299663299665 | 1.9663299663299665 | Unchanged | FoodFeedback_28!B58 |
| Gross-output farmers implied by current net surplus share | 181126.08890020655 | 181126.08890020655 | Unchanged | FoodFeedback_28!B62 |
| Processing labor, total | 24171 | 24171 | Unchanged | FoodSystem_13!B20 |
| Food-processing labor total | 24171 | 24171 | Unchanged | ProcessingFuelContainers_30!B14 |
Water & Sanitation (3)
| Label | Baseline value | Current scenario value | Change status | Workbook reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Combined first-order support labor | 1128 | 1128 | Unchanged | SanitationMedical_29!B34 |
| Combined first-order support labor | 1960.6647935615977 | 1960.6647935615977 | Unchanged | SanitationMedical_29!C34 |
| Combined first-order support labor | 9803.323967807988 | 9803.323967807988 | Unchanged | SanitationMedical_29!D34 |
Timber & Transport (27)
| Label | Baseline value | Current scenario value | Change status | Workbook reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Crew (mass) | 3.2 | 3.2 | Unchanged | BargeTimber_43!B7 |
| Payload subtotal (excl. hull) | 101.2 | 101.2 | Unchanged | BargeTimber_43!B9 |
| Standing acacia felled (incl. conversion waste) | 1129.0817444663596 | 1129.0817444663596 | Unchanged | BargeTimber_43!B19 |
| Total active ramp-system crew | 27.098131657063032 | 27.098131657063032 | Unchanged | RampSystem_32!B106 |
| Total active ramp-system crew | 108.09065828531514 | 108.09065828531514 | Unchanged | RampSystem_32!C106 |
| Total active ramp-system crew | 311.47197485594546 | 311.47197485594546 | Unchanged | RampSystem_32!D106 |
| Total active ramp-system crew | 622.9439497118909 | 622.9439497118909 | Unchanged | RampSystem_32!E106 |
| Total material handled over build (m3) | 212500.0 | 212500.0 | Unchanged | RampSystem_32!B109 |
| Total material handled over build (m3) | 1062500.0 | 1062500.0 | Unchanged | RampSystem_32!C109 |
| Total material handled over build (m3) | 3187500.0 | 3187500.0 | Unchanged | RampSystem_32!D109 |
| Total material handled over build (m3) | 6375000.0 | 6375000.0 | Unchanged | RampSystem_32!E109 |
| Total material handled mass (t) | 382500.0 | 382500.0 | Unchanged | RampSystem_32!B110 |
| Total material handled mass (t) | 1912500.0 | 1912500.0 | Unchanged | RampSystem_32!C110 |
| Total material handled mass (t) | 5737500.0 | 5737500.0 | Unchanged | RampSystem_32!D110 |
| Total material handled mass (t) | 11475000.0 | 11475000.0 | Unchanged | RampSystem_32!E110 |
| Barge crews rostered | 557.0 | 557.0 | Unchanged | RiverHarbor_47!B24 |
| Harbor gangs rostered | 140.0 | 140.0 | Unchanged | RiverHarbor_47!B26 |
| Pilotage rostered | 46.0 | 46.0 | Unchanged | RiverHarbor_47!B28 |
| TOTAL RIVER/HARBOR ROSTERED | 743.0 | 743.0 | Unchanged | RiverHarbor_47!B29 |
| Crew-days over campaign | 54605.76923076923 | 54605.76923076923 | Unchanged | RiverHarbor_47!B32 |
| Grain over campaign (t) | 54.605769230769226 | 54.605769230769226 | Unchanged | RiverHarbor_47!B33 |
| Provisions capacity check (t) | 300 | 300 | Unchanged | RiverHarbor_47!B34 |
| Headway per team (team + spec gap) | 48.0 | 48.0 | Unchanged | RouteCapacity_12!B5 |
| TOTAL SIMULTANEOUS HAUL LANES | 7 | 7 | Unchanged | RouteCapacity_12!B13 |
| TOTAL TIMBER PER YEAR | 4130.476955143621 | 4130.476955143621 | Unchanged | TimberLabor_40!B7 |
| Barge hull timber, felled (Wave 5 feed) - native acacia, yard-built | 80.64869603331141 | 80.64869603331141 | Unchanged | TimberLabor_40!B8 |
| Subtotal, direct timber labor | 819 | 819 | Unchanged | TimberLabor_40!B16 |
Granite (3)
| Label | Baseline value | Current scenario value | Change status | Workbook reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Granite operation active labor (peak campaign) | 1601.0 | 1601.0 | Unchanged | GraniteAswan_42!B36 |
| Rostered (x roster/replacement) | 2783.0 | 2783.0 | Unchanged | GraniteAswan_42!B37 |
| Status | INTEGRATED INTO M3 (Wave 5) - bodies only; capability gaps remain FINDINGS; river corridor support now priced in RiverHarbor_47 (Wave 6, v0.63) | INTEGRATED INTO M3 (Wave 5) - bodies only; capability gaps remain FINDINGS; river corridor support now priced in RiverHarbor_47 (Wave 6, v0.63) | Unchanged | GraniteAswan_42!B39 |
Findings & Validation (24)
| Label | Baseline value | Current scenario value | Change status | Workbook reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feedback-solved food support population | Separate food-method fork | Active labor | FoodFeedback_28 | 261803.70374236684 | 261803.70374236684 | Unchanged | DiagnosticIntegration_35!D5 |
| Feedback-solved food support population | Rostered labor | FoodFeedback_28 | 261803.70374236684 | 261803.70374236684 | Unchanged | DiagnosticIntegration_35!E5 |
| Sanitation / medical / cleaning labor | First-order support diagnostic | Active labor | SanitationMedical_29 | 1128 | 1128 | Unchanged | DiagnosticIntegration_35!D6 |
| F1 (M1): Hauling rostered labor vs adjusted effective labor pool: | 8761 | 8761 | Unchanged | Findings_09!B3 |
| F2 (M2): On-site rostered labor, four priced departments: | 47316 | 47316 | Unchanged | Findings_09!B4 |
| F3 (M2): Implied village population vs excavated capacity of 25,000: | 281642.85714285716 | 281642.85714285716 | Unchanged | Findings_09!B5 |
| F4 (M3, partial): Total project-dedicated population: | 533233.8571428572 | 533233.8571428572 | Unchanged | Findings_09!B6 |
| F22 (Granite): Aswan expedition integrated into M3 (Wave 5, bodies only). | Peak campaign corps of 1,601 active / 2,783 rostered enters M3 with no family multiplier (expedition concession). Shore-lift, refloat, and mid-route repair capability gaps remain findings, not priced mechanisms. | Peak campaign corps of 1,601 active / 2,783 rostered enters M3 with no family multiplier (expedition concession). Shore-lift, refloat, and mid-route repair capability gaps remain findings, not priced mechanisms. | Unchanged | Findings_09!B41 |
| F23 (Barge feed): Granite barge felled timber feeds TimberLabor_40 (Wave 5). | Felled barge acacia of 80.6 m3/yr enters felling/sawing/overhead labor. Cedar-import voyage and Giza overland haul lines are excluded because hulls are native acacia built at riverside yards - generous to the conventional scenario. | Felled barge acacia of 80.6 m3/yr enters felling/sawing/overhead labor. Cedar-import voyage and Giza overland haul lines are excluded because hulls are native acacia built at riverside yards - generous to the conventional scenario. | Unchanged | Findings_09!B42 |
| F24 (Numerator ruling): Test 1 reports the ex-farmer labor share. | Ruling 2026-07-09: annual-yield farmers (46,350 rostered) are excluded from the Test 1 numerator because their burden is priced in Test 2. Ruling MR-08 (v0.81) puts the share on a dimensionally consistent basis: concurrent ex-farmer labor against the standing non-farm pool. Ex-farmer share: 61.6% (2.5x the benchmark). The pre-correction rostered/standing figure of 70.4% is retained as a transparency line, as is the inclusive share. | Ruling 2026-07-09: annual-yield farmers (46,350 rostered) are excluded from the Test 1 numerator because their burden is priced in Test 2. Ruling MR-08 (v0.81) puts the share on a dimensionally consistent basis: concurrent ex-farmer labor against the standing non-farm pool. Ex-farmer share: 61.6% (2.5x the benchmark). The pre-correction rostered/standing figure of 70.4% is retained as a transparency line, as is the inclusive share. | Unchanged | Findings_09!B43 |
| F26 (River/harbor): Granite corridor support organization priced. | F26 (River/harbor): Granite corridor support organization priced. | F26 (River/harbor): Granite corridor support organization priced. | Unchanged | Findings_09!A45 |
| F26 (River/harbor): Granite corridor support organization priced. | RiverHarbor_47 (Wave 6): barge crews, harbor gangs at both ends, and pilotage enter M3 as bodies only, anchored to the Diary of Merer - the mainstream's own document. The voyage schedule is feasible on paper (~1.1 barge-seasons for 30 pieces); the burden is the standing organization. Gates 1-4 in GraniteAswan_42 remain unresolved capability findings. Army-sourcing objection pre-answered: soldiers come from the same prime-age cohort; the numerator counts bodies. | RiverHarbor_47 (Wave 6): barge crews, harbor gangs at both ends, and pilotage enter M3 as bodies only, anchored to the Diary of Merer - the mainstream's own document. The voyage schedule is feasible on paper (~1.1 barge-seasons for 30 pieces); the burden is the standing organization. Gates 1-4 in GraniteAswan_42 remain unresolved capability findings. Army-sourcing objection pre-answered: soldiers come from the same prime-age cohort; the numerator counts bodies. | Unchanged | Findings_09!B45 |
| F26 (River/harbor): Granite corridor support organization priced. | RiverHarbor_47 / GraniteAswan_42 / SRC-MERER | RiverHarbor_47 / GraniteAswan_42 / SRC-MERER | Unchanged | Findings_09!C45 |
| Objection | "The army crewed the barges and harbors." | "The army crewed the barges and harbors." | Unchanged | Objections_10!A21 |
| Model response | Changes nothing. Soldiers are drawn from the same 384,000-man prime-age cohort; the Test 1 numerator counts bodies regardless of which state department supplies them. And an army standing crew duty on a 20-30 year monument corridor is not garrisoning borders or fielding campaigns - the demographic closure comparator (Weni) already prices what the kingdom could mobilize and for how long. | Changes nothing. Soldiers are drawn from the same 384,000-man prime-age cohort; the Test 1 numerator counts bodies regardless of which state department supplies them. And an army standing crew duty on a 20-30 year monument corridor is not garrisoning borders or fielding campaigns - the demographic closure comparator (Weni) already prices what the kingdom could mobilize and for how long. | Unchanged | Objections_10!B21 |
| Total project-dedicated population ties across sheets. | 533233.8571428572 | 533233.8571428572 | Unchanged | QAChecks_08!F12 |
| Final shaping/trim | 0.5 | 0.5 | Unchanged | ShapingSetting_33!D51 |
| Final shaping/trim | 25.714285714285715 | 25.714285714285715 | Unchanged | ShapingSetting_33!E51 |
| Final shaping/trim | 44.69600593225527 | 44.69600593225527 | Unchanged | ShapingSetting_33!F51 |
| Setting/alignment support | 0.4 | 0.4 | Unchanged | ShapingSetting_33!D52 |
| Setting/alignment support | 82.28571428571429 | 82.28571428571429 | Unchanged | ShapingSetting_33!E52 |
| Setting/alignment support | 143.02721898321687 | 143.02721898321687 | Unchanged | ShapingSetting_33!F52 |
| Rework/correction | 0.05 | 0.05 | Unchanged | ShapingSetting_33!C54 |
| Rework/correction | 108.0 | 108.0 | Unchanged | ShapingSetting_33!D54 |
Assumptions & Inputs (4)
| Label | Baseline value | Current scenario value | Change status | Workbook reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reference labor pool | 3000 | 3000 | Unchanged | Assumptions_02!E16 |
| Village capacity (excavated) | 25000 | 25000 | Unchanged | Assumptions_02!E17 |
| Aswan-Giza river corridor distance (km each way) | 890 | 890 | Unchanged | Assumptions_02!E94 |
| Aswan-Giza river corridor (each way) | 890 | 890 | Unchanged | Inputs_03!B193 |
Baseline Facts
Technical detail — expand for tables, workbook references, and exact values
Baseline Closure Results
| Measure | Baseline value | Subsystem | Output type | Workbook reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Project labor as share of the NON-FARM male labor pool | 0.6164306640625001 | National closure | Metric | NationalClosure_41!B13 |
| National mobilization test | EXCEEDS SINGLE-PROJECT MOBILIZATION CEILING | National closure | Status | NationalClosure_41!B14 |
| Project workforce vs. Weni mobilization maximum — concurrent | 0.9468375 | Demographic closure | Metric | DemographicClosure_46!B32 |
| Project workforce vs. Weni mobilization maximum — rostered | 1.0821 | Demographic closure | Metric | DemographicClosure_46!B33 |
| Documented mobilization limit test | APPROACHING THE MAXIMUM DOCUMENTED MOBILIZATION - AND HELD CONTINUOUSLY RATHER THAN LEVIED ONCE | Demographic closure | Status | DemographicClosure_46!B35 |
| Demographic closure verdict | DOES NOT CLOSE - SUSTAINED MOBILIZATION AT THE SCALE OF MAXIMUM DOCUMENTED CAPACITY, HELD CONTINUOUSLY | Demographic closure | Conclusion | DemographicClosure_46!B38 |
Evidence Provenance
Recorded Sources and References
Sources supporting the displayed closure results
Computation Provenance
- Workbook version
- v0.92
- Workbook SHA-256
- 4c7191452c0f8bd9c8ade1259e52f53b7b52817d69dd624c0b1c53ea7981580e
- Baseline tag
- v0.64-baseline
- Engine package
- qa_shadow_model
- Engine commit
- 5d420bb2ae8a4763c4cc32ad846884c7581d1a18
- Target registry version
- gp.v064.targets.v1
Scenario Provenance
- Entered by
- browser-foundation
- Entered at
- 2026-07-15T12:00:00+00:00
- Source note
- Baseline: no assumption is overridden.
- Justification
- Baseline reference state for the review page.
- Evidence reference
- Protected workbook baseline.
Baseline Closure Outputs
| Workbook reference | Source module | Provenance note | Value type | Comparison capability |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NationalClosure_41!B13 | national_closure | Formula-backed Test 1 metric used by NationalClosure_41!B14. | float | numeric_delta |
| NationalClosure_41!B14 | national_closure | Formula-backed Test 1 status preserving workbook status strings. | string | categorical_transition |
| DemographicClosure_46!B32 | demographic_closure | Formula-backed demographic closure metric feeding Test C status. | float | numeric_delta |
| DemographicClosure_46!B33 | demographic_closure | Formula-backed demographic closure metric feeding Test C status. | float | numeric_delta |
| DemographicClosure_46!B35 | demographic_closure | Formula-backed Test C status preserving workbook status strings. | string | categorical_transition |
| DemographicClosure_46!B38 | demographic_closure | Explicit demographic closure verdict output. | string | categorical_transition |
Changed Closure Outputs
| Workbook reference | Source module | Provenance note | Value type | Comparison capability |
|---|
Evidence Sources
Register identifiers are kept verbatim; their prefixes mark the entry type:
- SRC-
- External or cited source
- JUDG-
- Modeling judgment or control rule
- OPEN-
- Unresolved evidence requirement
- STEEL-
- Named model mechanism or credit
- SRC-METHOD-
- Internal method / governance reference
Source register (93 entries, verbatim from SourceRegister_01)
Entries print exactly as the workbook holds them, including their own unfinished citations. OPEN ITEM in the citation column means the value is in use and its page reference is not yet pinned; the Notes column states what is outstanding. That is distinct from a source id beginning OPEN-, which marks an evidence requirement the model has raised and not met. Confidence grades the value in use, not the completeness of its citation, so a high-confidence value may still carry an open page reference.
SRC-QUARRY-NOVA External or cited source — Quarry productivity trial
- Input / variable
- Quarry productivity trial
- Source / author
- NOVA This Old Pyramid trial (Lehner/Hopkins)
- Year
- 1992
- Value used
- 1.4 man-days/block
- Use type
- Transformed
- Confidence
- High
- Page / table / figure
- OPEN ITEM
- Notes
- Iron tools, <1 t blocks; scaling factors are engineering judgment.
SRC-ROPE-CHATHAM External or cited source — Ropemaking benchmark
- Input / variable
- Ropemaking benchmark
- Source / author
- Chatham Royal Dockyard - PRIMARY ATTRIBUTION UNVERIFIED
- Year
- 1798
- Value used
- 274 men
- Use type
- Direct
- Confidence
- Medium
- Page / table / figure
- OPEN ITEM - 274 men not traced to a primary record. Circulates in secondary summaries of the 1798 dockyard establishment (1,664); Ropeyard workforce recorded separately by the Navy Board, so accounting basis unconfirmed. Pin task: Coad, J.G. (1969) Chatham Ropeyard, Post-Medieval Archaeology 3, pp. 143-165, or NMM ADM/B muster returns.
- Notes
- Hand-era ropeyard benchmark. Input re-badged ASSUMPTION at v0.68. Ropewalk length (346 m) and first-rate rope requirement (~50 km) are separately pinned; only the headcount is unverified.
SRC-VILLAGECAP External or cited source — Worker village capacity
- Input / variable
- Worker village capacity
- Source / author
- Lehner 2002, "The Pyramid Age Settlement of the Southern Mount at Giza," JARCE 39:27-74; Lehner 2015, "Labor and the Pyramids," in Steinkeller & Hudson (eds.), Labor in the Ancient World, ISLET, pp. 397-522 (sight-verified); Lehner & Tavares 2010, pp. 171-216
- Year
- var.
- Value used
- ~25,000 persons - RE-BADGED ASSUMPTION (generous): ceiling set at top of mainstream workforce range (SRC-NOVA-WORKFORCE); published excavated-capacity arithmetic (gallery complex) is smaller. The claim that any smaller ceiling worsens M2 is WITHDRAWN (MR-22, v0.89). B32 is both the numerator of the village ratio and the capacity it is compared against, so the settlement overshoot reduces algebraically to on-site roster / B31 and does not move with the ceiling at all; implied village and M3 move in direct proportion, so a smaller ceiling lowers the burden. Measured: 15,000 -> M3 194,679; 25,000 -> 533,234.
- Use type
- Direct
- Confidence
- High
- Page / table / figure
- OPEN ITEM - needs exact AERA publication/page
- Notes
- AERA/Lehner worker-town capacity. Treat 25,000 as the project's stated ceiling rather than a page-pinned published capacity.
SRC-LAKE-KHUFU External or cited source — Harbor basin / delivery point
- Input / variable
- Harbor basin / delivery point
- Source / author
- Lehner 2020, "Lake Khufu: On the Waterfront at Giza," in Barta & Janak (eds.), Profane Landscapes, Sacred Spaces, Equinox, pp. 191-292; short form Lehner 2014, AERAGRAM 15.1-2:13-23; corrob. Sheisha et al. 2022, PNAS 119
- Year
- 2020
- Value used
- basin at plateau edge
- Use type
- Context anchor
- Confidence
- Medium
- Page / table / figure
- Lake Khufu / Lehner 2020 PDF - page verification needed
- Notes
- Use as context anchor only until exact figure/page is tied to workbook input.
SRC-GPMP-NILE External or cited source — Nile channel distance
- Input / variable
- Nile channel distance
- Source / author
- Lehner / GPMP reconstruction
- Year
- var.
- Value used
- ~1 km east of village
- Use type
- Context anchor
- Confidence
- Medium
- Page / table / figure
- OPEN ITEM - GPMP/Lehner page verification needed
- Notes
- Channel distance remains context anchor; exact value needs map/page citation.
SRC-MERER External or cited source — Water transport practice
- Input / variable
- Water transport practice
- Source / author
- Wadi el-Jarf papyri / Merer diary
- Year
- 2013+
- Value used
- boat deliveries to basin
- Use type
- Context anchor
- Confidence
- High
- Page / table / figure
- Tallet / Wadi el-Jarf publication needed
- Notes
- Use Merer as delivery-practice context only; not a complete logistics model. SHARED ID BY DESIGN: row 82 also carries SRC-MERER. Both rows describe the SAME source - the Merer diary - entered twice for two uses: this row for delivery practice, row 82 for river operations, crew organization and cadence with its own page pins. CitationControl_34 row 11 tracks them as one citation, and the three cells share one stored string. The id is deliberately not unique; do NOT rename either row to make it so - a rename in place would silently retag all three.
SRC-BIRNASIB External or cited source — Sinai copper output ceiling
- Input / variable
- Sinai copper output ceiling
- Source / author
- Slag ~100,000 t: Abdel-Motelib et al. 2012, Metalla 19.1/2; Hauptmann 2007; Rothenberg 1987. Metallic copper ~5,000 t: Bachmann calculation
- Year
- var.
- Value used
- 5,000-5,500 t all-time; slag mostly LBA/New Kingdom, so the OK-era ceiling is lower - the all-time figure is generous to the mainstream as used
- Use type
- Direct
- Confidence
- Medium
- Page / table / figure
- OPEN ITEM - verify archaeological citation/page
- Notes
- Bir Nasib total output needs primary/archaeometallurgy citation; PorterGeo/Petrie can be interim trail only.
SRC-BUTZER-POP External or cited source — Old Kingdom national population
- Input / variable
- Old Kingdom national population
- Source / author
- Butzer 1976, Early Hydraulic Civilization in Egypt, Univ. of Chicago Press, p. 83, Table 4 ("Hypothetical demographic development in ancient Egypt"); ch. 7, pp. 81-98; fig. 13, p. 85; open-access ISAC/Oriental Institute PDF
- Year
- 1976
- Value used
- 1.6 million at 2500 B.C. (p. 83 row sight-verified 2026-07-11); the source itself labels the table "hypothetical" - carried as a stress-test denominator, sensitivity at 2.0M/2.5M in ClosureSensitivity_45
- Use type
- Direct
- Confidence
- High
- Page / table / figure
- Table 4, p. 83 (page carries no printed number; bracketed by 82 and 84) / PDF p. 98
- Notes
- Table 4 lists total population of 1.6 million for 2500 B.C.; Butzer cautions demographic values are hypothetical working estimates, not census figures. URL and stress test are documented in KingdomCapacity_17.
SRC-CALENDAR External or cited source — Work calendar / absence
- Input / variable
- Work calendar / absence
- Source / author
- Deir el-Medina ostraca, e.g. BM 5634
- Year
- NK
- Value used
- 10-day week, rest days, absences
- Use type
- Pattern anchor
- Confidence
- Medium
- Page / table / figure
- OPEN ITEM
- Notes
- New Kingdom evidence applied cautiously to Old Kingdom.
SRC-MORTALITY External or cited source — Worker mortality
- Input / variable
- Worker mortality
- Source / author
- Giza worker cemetery skeletal studies (Hawass, workers cemetery report; skeletal analysis credited there to Azza Mohamed Sarry El-Din and Fawziya Hussein, National Research Centre, Cairo). Formal publication: Sarry El-Din, A.M. (2003) "Skeletal Remains from the Workers' Cemetery at Giza", in Hawass (ed., with Lyla Pinch Brock), Egyptology at the Dawn of the Twenty-First Century: Proceedings of the Eighth International Congress of Egyptologists, Cairo 2000, Vol. 2 (History, Religion), Cairo: AUC Press, pp. 397-404.
- Year
- var.
- Value used
- male death 30-35; healed fractures; arthritis
- Use type
- Direct
- Confidence
- Medium
- Page / table / figure
- Vol. 2 (History, Religion), pp. 397-404. SIGHT-VERIFIED 2026-09-03: volume, page range and editor confirmed by owner; the 30-35 male age-at-death range confirmed verbatim in the Hawass workers' cemetery report - "Many of the men died between age 30 and 35." Closes the prior PARTIAL / NOT SIGHT-VERIFIED status. Note a second, similar Sarry El-Din paper sits in the same proceedings ("Anthropological Differences between Workers and High Officials from the Old Kingdom at Giza"); do not attach this page range to that one.
- Notes
- Drives replacement multiplier; skeletal aging caveat remains.
SRC-HOUSEHOLD External or cited source — Household size
- Input / variable
- Household size
- Source / author
- Kemp; Kahun archaeology
- Year
- var.
- Value used
- avg 6, range 5-8 per house
- Use type
- Transformed
- Confidence
- Medium
- Page / table / figure
- OPEN ITEM
- Notes
- Transformed to project household/dependent assumptions.
SRC-BLOCKMASS External or cited source — Block mass range
- Input / variable
- Block mass range
- Source / author
- Mainstream literature
- Year
- var.
- Value used
- 2,500-3,000 kg
- Use type
- Direct
- Confidence
- High
- Page / table / figure
- OPEN ITEM
- Notes
- Default 3,000; steelman 2,500.
SRC-BUILDDURATION External or cited source — Build duration
- Input / variable
- Build duration
- Source / author
- Mainstream Khufu reign framework
- Year
- var.
- Value used
- ~20-30 years depending scenario
- Use type
- Direct/derived
- Confidence
- High
- Page / table / figure
- OPEN ITEM
- Notes
- Workbook cadence currently tied to selected duration assumptions.
SRC-PLATEAULIFT External or cited source — Plateau lift / basin to base
- Input / variable
- Plateau lift / basin to base
- Source / author
- Site topography
- Year
- var.
- Value used
- ~40 m
- Use type
- Direct
- Confidence
- Medium
- Page / table / figure
- OPEN ITEM
- Notes
- Needs published elevation anchor.
SRC-SINAI-EXPEDITION External or cited source — Sinai expedition composition
- Input / variable
- Sinai expedition composition
- Source / author
- Mining inscriptions
- Year
- var.
- Value used
- parties of several hundred
- Use type
- Context anchor
- Confidence
- Medium
- Page / table / figure
- OPEN ITEM
- Notes
- Mostly later evidence; Dyn 4 installations noted.
JUDG-MATERIAL-BALANCE Modeling judgment or control rule — Material-balance rule
- Input / variable
- Material-balance rule
- Source / author
- Engineering / accounting principle
- Year
- n/a
- Value used
- same output cannot be spent twice
- Use type
- Methodology
- Confidence
- High
- Page / table / figure
- n/a
- Notes
- Required output assigned to the pyramid is unavailable to non-pyramid uses.
JUDG-TRACKWATER Modeling judgment or control rule — Track wetting water
- Input / variable
- Track wetting water
- Source / author
- Engineering judgment / friction-moisture requirement
- Year
- n/a
- Value used
- L/m2/hr lever
- Use type
- Judgment
- Confidence
- Medium/Low
- Page / table / figure
- OPEN ITEM
- Notes
- Water volume included; labor chain pending.
JUDG-FOOD-PARTIAL Modeling judgment or control rule — Food system partial status
- Input / variable
- Food system partial status
- Source / author
- Model method
- Year
- n/a
- Value used
- grain/fuel included; full diet pending
- Use type
- Methodology
- Confidence
- Medium
- Page / table / figure
- n/a
- Notes
- Prevents double counting of village processing labor.
JUDG-ONSITE-DOMWATER Modeling judgment or control rule — On-site domestic/process water
- Input / variable
- On-site domestic/process water
- Source / author
- Engineering judgment / minimum human-support allowance
- Year
- n/a
- Value used
- 5+2+3 L/person/day default
- Use type
- Judgment / sensitivity
- Confidence
- Medium/Low
- Page / table / figure
- OPEN ITEM
- Notes
- Quantified in HumanRequirements_20; can be loaded into main M3 via WaterFeedback_21 algebraic carrier feedback toggle.
JUDG-OFFSITE-DOMWATER Modeling judgment or control rule — Off-site project-support household water
- Input / variable
- Off-site project-support household water
- Source / author
- Engineering judgment / local-regional water footprint
- Year
- n/a
- Value used
- 5 L/person/day default
- Use type
- Judgment / sensitivity
- Confidence
- Medium/Low
- Page / table / figure
- OPEN ITEM
- Notes
- Quantified as local/regional footprint, not Giza-delivered water.
JUDG-CAMPWATER Modeling judgment or control rule — Remote expedition/camp water
- Input / variable
- Remote expedition/camp water
- Source / author
- Engineering judgment / remote labor camp burden
- Year
- n/a
- Value used
- 8 L/person/day default
- Use type
- Judgment / sensitivity
- Confidence
- Medium/Low
- Page / table / figure
- OPEN ITEM
- Notes
- Input lever reserved for future separation of Sinai/mining/expedition camp water.
JUDG-HUMANREQ-CONTROL Modeling judgment or control rule — Universal human requirements control
- Input / variable
- Universal human requirements control
- Source / author
- Model methodology
- Year
- n/a
- Value used
- Every counted person carries support needs
- Use type
- Methodology
- Confidence
- High
- Page / table / figure
- n/a
- Notes
- Requires food, water, rest/absence, replacement where applicable, and household support to be assigned or explicitly marked as coverage gap.
JUDG-WATERFEEDBACK Modeling judgment or control rule — Domestic water carrier feedback solution
- Input / variable
- Domestic water carrier feedback solution
- Source / author
- Model methodology
- Year
- n/a
- Value used
- algebraic carrier-village-water solution
- Use type
- Methodology
- Confidence
- High
- Page / table / figure
- n/a
- Notes
- Solves feedback between domestic/process water, water carriers, on-site rostered labor, and implied village population without circular spreadsheet formulas.
STEEL-YOUTH-LIGHTSUPPORT Named model mechanism or credit — Youth light-support credit active
- Input / variable
- Youth light-support credit active
- Source / author
- Modeling concession
- Year
- 2026
- Value used
- YES
- Use type
- Steelman concession
- Confidence
- Medium/Low
- Page / table / figure
- Workbook methodology
- Notes
- Recognizes likely intermittent youth household assistance without treating children as full adult labor.
STEEL-YOUTH-CREDIT Named model mechanism or credit — Youth light-support credit rate
- Input / variable
- Youth light-support credit rate
- Source / author
- Modeling concession
- Year
- 2026
- Value used
- 5%
- Use type
- Steelman concession
- Confidence
- Medium/Low
- Page / table / figure
- Workbook methodology
- Notes
- Bounded at 5%; higher values require separate youth labor department assumptions.
JUDG-YOUTH-PRODUCTIVITY Modeling judgment or control rule — Youth water-carrying productivity factor
- Input / variable
- Youth water-carrying productivity factor
- Source / author
- Engineering judgment
- Year
- 2026
- Value used
- 40% adult-equivalent
- Use type
- Sensitivity check only
- Confidence
- Low
- Page / table / figure
- Open item
- Notes
- Used only to estimate implied youth headcount for credit magnitude.
JUDG-WATERINFRA-GATE Modeling judgment or control rule — Water infrastructure alternatives
- Input / variable
- Water infrastructure alternatives
- Source / author
- Model methodology
- Year
- 2026
- Value used
- replacement-burden gate
- Use type
- Methodology
- Confidence
- High
- Page / table / figure
- WaterInfraAlt_27
- Notes
- Alternative water-delivery claims are not allowed to reduce M3 carrier burden unless the replacement system is assigned and cost-loaded.
OPEN-WATERINFRA-EVIDENCE Unresolved evidence requirement — Canal/depot/well/storage/animal/boat water options
- Input / variable
- Canal/depot/well/storage/animal/boat water options
- Source / author
- Open source item
- Year
- n/a
- Value used
- TBD
- Use type
- Open item
- Confidence
- Open
- Page / table / figure
- OPEN ITEM
- Notes
- Requires archaeological, geomorphic, textual, or engineering source support before any alternative is integrated into main totals.
JUDG-WATERRELIEF-SENS Modeling judgment or control rule — First-order water-relief scenarios
- Input / variable
- First-order water-relief scenarios
- Source / author
- Model sensitivity
- Year
- 2026
- Value used
- 0-90% reduction scenarios
- Use type
- Sensitivity only
- Confidence
- Medium/Low
- Page / table / figure
- WaterInfraAlt_27
- Notes
- Shows approximate first-order carrier relief only; not a main-model change until replacement burden and feedback are solved.
JUDG-FOODFEEDBACK Modeling judgment or control rule — Food farmer-household feedback
- Input / variable
- Food farmer-household feedback
- Source / author
- Model methodology
- Year
- 2026
- Value used
- positive farmer surplus required
- Use type
- Methodology
- Confidence
- High
- Page / table / figure
- FoodFeedback_28
- Notes
- Agricultural labor cannot be added as free surplus; farmer households must be supported before project surplus exists.
OPEN-GRAIN-PROD Unresolved evidence requirement — Farmer productivity / hectares per farmer
- Input / variable
- Farmer productivity / hectares per farmer
- Source / author
- Open source item
- Year
- n/a
- Value used
- TBD
- Use type
- Open item
- Confidence
- Open
- Page / table / figure
- OPEN ITEM
- Notes
- FoodFeedback_28 shows current 1.5 ha/farmer and 1.2 t/ha/yr assumptions do not generate positive surplus after household support.
OPEN-FOOD-DIST Unresolved evidence requirement — Food transport/distribution/reserve system
- Input / variable
- Food transport/distribution/reserve system
- Source / author
- Open source item
- Year
- n/a
- Value used
- TBD
- Use type
- Open item
- Confidence
- Open
- Page / table / figure
- OPEN ITEM
- Notes
- Need sourced treatment for local/off-site provisioning, Giza delivery, storage/spoilage, seed reserve, bad-flood buffer, and administrative distribution.
JUDG-SANITATION-CONTROL Modeling judgment or control rule — Sanitation/basic medical support
- Input / variable
- Sanitation/basic medical support
- Source / author
- Model methodology
- Year
- 2026
- Value used
- required-function diagnostic
- Use type
- Methodology
- Confidence
- High
- Page / table / figure
- SanitationMedical_29
- Notes
- Waste handling, cleaning, and basic care are required functions for a large worker village; sheet is diagnostic only, not main-model integration.
OPEN-SANITATION-RATES Unresolved evidence requirement — Sanitation/medical/cleaning labor rates
- Input / variable
- Sanitation/medical/cleaning labor rates
- Source / author
- Open source item
- Year
- n/a
- Value used
- TBD
- Use type
- Open item
- Confidence
- Open
- Page / table / figure
- OPEN ITEM
- Notes
- First-order rates in Inputs_03 B122:B124 are placeholders until sourced or replaced by an explicit archaeological/engineering mechanism.
JUDG-PROCESS-CONTAINER Modeling judgment or control rule — Processing/fuel/container support
- Input / variable
- Processing/fuel/container support
- Source / author
- Model methodology
- Year
- 2026
- Value used
- required-function diagnostic
- Use type
- Methodology
- Confidence
- High
- Page / table / figure
- ProcessingFuelContainers_30
- Notes
- Food, water, and fuel streams require processing, containers/handling gear, fuel, storage, and distribution; control only, not main M3 integration.
OPEN-CONTAINER-RATES Unresolved evidence requirement — Container capacity / breakage / replacement
- Input / variable
- Container capacity / breakage / replacement
- Source / author
- Open source item
- Year
- n/a
- Value used
- TBD
- Use type
- Open item
- Confidence
- Open
- Page / table / figure
- OPEN ITEM
- Notes
- Need sourced or explicitly engineered assumptions for jars, baskets, sacks, skins, breakage, production, replacement, kiln/fuel burden, and transport.
OPEN-FUEL-TRANSPORT Unresolved evidence requirement — Oven/brewery fuel collection and transport
- Input / variable
- Oven/brewery fuel collection and transport
- Source / author
- Open source item
- Year
- n/a
- Value used
- TBD
- Use type
- Open item
- Confidence
- Open
- Page / table / figure
- OPEN ITEM
- Notes
- FoodSystem_13 quantifies fuel mass/woodland footprint; labor, route, collection, storage, and fuel-delivery burden remain open.
JUDG-TIMBER-GATE Modeling judgment or control rule — Timber required-function gate
- Input / variable
- Timber required-function gate
- Source / author
- Model methodology
- Year
- 2026
- Value used
- replacement mechanism required
- Use type
- Methodology
- Confidence
- High
- Page / table / figure
- TimberSystem_31
- Notes
- Any timber reduction must identify the replacement mechanism and cost-load labor/material/transport/feedback.
OPEN-TIMBER-STOCK Unresolved evidence requirement — Structural timber stock in service
- Input / variable
- Structural timber stock in service
- Source / author
- Open model item
- Year
- n/a
- Value used
- TBD
- Use type
- Open item
- Confidence
- Open
- Page / table / figure
- OPEN ITEM
- Notes
- Requires WBS inventory for sleds, planks, levers, cribbing, anchors, boats, workshops, repair stock.
OPEN-TIMBER-SPECIES Unresolved evidence requirement — Structural wood suitability / service life
- Input / variable
- Structural wood suitability / service life
- Source / author
- Open source item
- Year
- n/a
- Value used
- TBD
- Use type
- Open item
- Confidence
- Open
- Page / table / figure
- OPEN ITEM
- Notes
- Need species, size, grade, reject, service life, and competing-use treatment for cedar/acacia/tamarisk/sycamore/palm/non-wood materials.
SRC-PALERMO-CEDAR External or cited source — Snefru cedar import comparator
- Input / variable
- Snefru cedar import comparator
- Source / author
- Palermo Stone / royal annal tradition
- Year
- Old Kingdom
- Value used
- 40 ships (SOURCED) / ~68.6 m3/ship, ~2,745 m3 total comparator (ASSUMPTION, generous-high)
- Use type
- Context / comparator
- Confidence
- Medium
- Page / table / figure
- Wilkinson, Royal Annals of Ancient Egypt: The Palermo Stone and its Associated Fragments, Kegan Paul, 2000, pp. 141-145
- Notes
- Ship count (40) is sourced to the cited pages. Per-ship volume (~68.6 m3/ship, ~2,745 m3 total) is an assumption, deliberately generous-high: a larger comparator volume shrinks demand ratios, favoring the conventional scenario. Used only as comparator/source-control line; does not establish project availability or eliminate procurement/fabrication burden.
OPEN-TIMBER-LABOR Unresolved evidence requirement — Timber procurement/fabrication/transport labor
- Input / variable
- Timber procurement/fabrication/transport labor
- Source / author
- Open model item
- Year
- n/a
- Value used
- TBD
- Use type
- Open item
- Confidence
- Open
- Page / table / figure
- OPEN ITEM
- Notes
- Woodcutters, carpenters, sawyers, haulers, boat crews, repair crews, households, food, water, and feedback not integrated.
JUDG-RAMP-GATE Modeling judgment or control rule — Ramp required-function gate
- Input / variable
- Ramp required-function gate
- Source / author
- Model methodology
- Year
- 2026
- Value used
- replacement mechanism required
- Use type
- Methodology
- Confidence
- High
- Page / table / figure
- RampSystem_32
- Notes
- Ramp claims must be treated as route/lift/access systems with geometry, materials, surface maintenance, traffic capacity, and removal/rework burden.
OPEN-RAMP-GEOMETRY Unresolved evidence requirement — Ramp geometry / volume / phasing
- Input / variable
- Ramp geometry / volume / phasing
- Source / author
- Open model item
- Year
- n/a
- Value used
- TBD
- Use type
- Open item
- Confidence
- Open
- Page / table / figure
- OPEN ITEM
- Notes
- Requires selected ramp type, footprint, grade, width, turns, staging, final-course access, and phasing before quantitative integration.
OPEN-RAMP-PROD Unresolved evidence requirement — Ramp construction/maintenance productivity
- Input / variable
- Ramp construction/maintenance productivity
- Source / author
- Open source item
- Year
- n/a
- Value used
- TBD
- Use type
- Open item
- Confidence
- Open
- Page / table / figure
- OPEN ITEM
- Notes
- Inputs_03 B159:B161 are placeholders until source/engineering basis is assigned.
OPEN-RAMP-TRAFFIC Unresolved evidence requirement — Ramp traffic capacity / surface treatment
- Input / variable
- Ramp traffic capacity / surface treatment
- Source / author
- Open model item
- Year
- n/a
- Value used
- TBD
- Use type
- Open item
- Confidence
- Open
- Page / table / figure
- OPEN ITEM
- Notes
- Need lane width, passing/return paths, staging, surface friction/wear, maintenance, water/timber/paving, and repair disruption treatment.
SRC-METHOD-SOURCE-CONTROL Internal method / governance reference — Citation/source-control method
- Input / variable
- Citation/source-control method
- Source / author
- Internal model-control rule
- Year
- 2026
- Value used
- Load-bearing sources ranked by citation status and page/URL completeness
- Use type
- Methodology
- Confidence
- High
- Page / table / figure
- CitationControl_34
- Notes
- v0.40 adds source-status controls; no model value changes.
SRC-METHOD-AG-ROSTER Internal method / governance reference — Annual-yield agricultural producers
- Input / variable
- Annual-yield agricultural producers
- Source / author
- Internal model-control rule
- Year
- 2026
- Value used
- Annual crop yield is yearly output; roster factor 1.0
- Use type
- Prevents double-counting farmer availability
- Confidence
- High
- Page / table / figure
- FoodFeedback_28 / Model_04 B124,B128
- Notes
- Accounting/control rule; annual-yield producers differ from standing project-service crews.
SRC-METHOD-CAPACITY-BANDS Internal method / governance reference — Internal model-control rule
- Input / variable
- Internal model-control rule
- Source / author
- 2026
- Year
- Mobilization-capacity bands
- Value used
- 50k-500k capacity-band table; 150k reference screen
- Use type
- State-capacity stress-test framing
- Confidence
- Not a source/census claim; 9.375% is arithmetic only
- Page / table / figure
- KingdomCapacity_17
- Notes
- Replaces single-cutoff framing.
SRC-AERA-HEG External or cited source — Heit el-Ghurab / Giza worker settlement
- Input / variable
- Heit el-Ghurab / Giza worker settlement
- Source / author
- AERA
- Year
- var.
- Value used
- Worker town / provisioning context
- Use type
- Capacity-screen rationale
- Confidence
- High
- Page / table / figure
- https://aeraweb.org/projects/lost-city/
- Notes
- Supports organized provisioning; does not set a 150k ceiling.
SRC-NOVA-WORKFORCE External or cited source — Mainstream Giza workforce comparator
- Input / variable
- Mainstream Giza workforce comparator
- Source / author
- PBS NOVA / Lehner-Hawass context
- Year
- var.
- Value used
- 20,000-30,000 laborer search context
- Use type
- Comparator
- Confidence
- Medium
- Page / table / figure
- https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/pyramid/explore/builders.html
- Notes
- Public NOVA workforce context; use only as comparator, not as direct source for model calculations.
Open source: https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/pyramid/explore/builders.html
SRC-REDDING-2SITES External or cited source — Old Kingdom production-consumption network
- Input / variable
- Old Kingdom production-consumption network
- Source / author
- Redding 2013, "A Tale of Two Sites," in De Cupere, Linseele & Hamilton-Dyer (eds.), Archaeozoology of the Near East X, Peeters, pp. 307-322 (sight-verified); companion: Redding 2016, in Wenke, Redding & Cagle (eds.), Kom el-Hisn, Lockwood Press, pp. 139-203
- Year
- 2013
- Value used
- Kom el-Hisn / Heit el-Ghurab production-consumption model; author's stated conclusion: "labour, not land, must have been the limiting factor"
- Use type
- Provisioning context
- Confidence
- Medium
- Page / table / figure
- https://aeraweb.org/projects/lost-city/
- Notes
- AERA page lists Redding citation; formal publication details/page still needed for white paper.
SRC-BOSERUP-SURPLUS External or cited source — Preindustrial agrarian surplus/intensification logic
- Input / variable
- Preindustrial agrarian surplus/intensification logic
- Source / author
- Boserup
- Year
- 1965
- Value used
- Agrarian output is constrained by labor, seasonality, and intensification
- Use type
- General framework
- Confidence
- Medium
- Page / table / figure
- https://www.biw.kuleuven.be/aee/clo/idessa_files/boserup1965.pdf
- Notes
- General agrarian-surplus framework only; not a numerical limit or Egypt-specific ceiling.
Open source: https://www.biw.kuleuven.be/aee/clo/idessa_files/boserup1965.pdf
SRC-METHOD-SHAPING-GATE Internal method / governance reference — Internal WBS gate
- Input / variable
- Internal WBS gate
- Source / author
- 2026
- Year
- Shaping/fitting/setting scope
- Value used
- Quarry copper is not final fitting/setting copper
- Use type
- Prevents hidden scope loss
- Confidence
- Future module requires external productivity/tool support
- Page / table / figure
- Internal QA
- Notes
- Future integration remains required.
SRC-METHOD-SHAPING-DIAG Internal method / governance reference — Internal diagnostic method
- Input / variable
- Internal diagnostic method
- Source / author
- 2026
- Year
- Shaping/setting quantified diagnostic
- Value used
- Direct labor + roster + diagnostic population + copper/tool burden, not integrated
- Use type
- Makes pending scope visible
- Confidence
- Internal method; source/productivity gaps remain open
- Page / table / figure
- ShapingSetting_33
- Notes
- v0.41 diagnostic only; not a historical productivity claim.
OPEN-SHAPING-PROD Unresolved evidence requirement — Shaping/setting productivity basis
- Input / variable
- Shaping/setting productivity basis
- Source / author
- Open source item
- Year
- n/a
- Value used
- TBD
- Use type
- Open item
- Confidence
- Open
- Page / table / figure
- OPEN ITEM
- Notes
- Need sourced or explicitly bounded productivity for final trim, setting/alignment, casing-equivalent work, rework, and copper wear before M3 integration.
OPEN-CASING-SCOPE Unresolved evidence requirement — Casing stone count/equivalent-unit treatment
- Input / variable
- Casing stone count/equivalent-unit treatment
- Source / author
- Open source/model item
- Year
- n/a
- Value used
- TBD
- Use type
- Open item
- Confidence
- Open
- Page / table / figure
- OPEN ITEM
- Notes
- Define casing-equivalent units, finishing scope, Tura transport split, and relation to shaping/setting before M3 integration.
SRC-METHOD-SHAPING-READINESS Internal method / governance reference — Internal integration gate
- Input / variable
- Internal integration gate
- Source / author
- 2026
- Year
- ShapingSetting_33 M3-readiness review
- Value used
- Diagnostic quantified; integration rejected pending gates
- Use type
- Prevents premature M3 integration
- Confidence
- Internal control
- Page / table / figure
- ShapingSetting_33 A79:G96
- Notes
- v0.42 control only; no headline model-value change.
OPEN-SHAPING-COPPER-WEAR Unresolved evidence requirement — Final fitting/setting copper-tool wear
- Input / variable
- Final fitting/setting copper-tool wear
- Source / author
- Open source/model item
- Year
- n/a
- Value used
- TBD
- Use type
- Open item
- Confidence
- Open
- Page / table / figure
- OPEN ITEM
- Notes
- Quarry loss proxy remains placeholder; final fitting/setting tool wear may differ and must be sourced or bounded.
OPEN-SHAPING-PERSON-FEEDBACK Unresolved evidence requirement — Shaping/setting person-category and support feedback
- Input / variable
- Shaping/setting person-category and support feedback
- Source / author
- Open model item
- Year
- n/a
- Value used
- TBD
- Use type
- Open item
- Confidence
- Open
- Page / table / figure
- PersonCategoryMatrix_22 / WaterFeedback_21 / FoodFeedback_28
- Notes
- Before M3 integration, new crews need roster, household, water, food, sanitation, and processing treatment.
SRC-METHOD-TIMBER-DIAG Internal method / governance reference — Internal diagnostic method
- Input / variable
- Internal diagnostic method
- Source / author
- 2026
- Year
- Structural timber stock/replacement screen
- Value used
- Base active stock + annual replacement + gross cumulative procurement screen
- Use type
- Makes pending timber dependency visible
- Confidence
- Internal method; source/productivity gaps remain open
- Page / table / figure
- TimberSystem_31
- Notes
- v0.43 diagnostic only; not a historical timber inventory claim.
OPEN-TIMBER-STOCK-WBS Unresolved evidence requirement — Structural timber WBS inventory
- Input / variable
- Structural timber WBS inventory
- Source / author
- Open model item
- Year
- n/a
- Value used
- TBD
- Use type
- Open item
- Confidence
- Open
- Page / table / figure
- TimberSystem_31 A80:G91
- Notes
- Need source/bounds for sled rigs, ramp/track surface modules, anchors, levers, cribbing, boats, workshops, and repair reserve.
OPEN-TIMBER-SERVICE-LIFE Unresolved evidence requirement — Structural timber service life / turnover
- Input / variable
- Structural timber service life / turnover
- Source / author
- Open source/model item
- Year
- n/a
- Value used
- TBD
- Use type
- Open item
- Confidence
- Open
- Page / table / figure
- TimberSystem_31 A94:G100
- Notes
- Annual turnover is sensitivity-only until use-class service life is sourced or bounded.
OPEN-TIMBER-SPECIES-GRADE Unresolved evidence requirement — Species, grade, dimensions, conversion/reject rates
- Input / variable
- Species, grade, dimensions, conversion/reject rates
- Source / author
- Open source item
- Year
- n/a
- Value used
- TBD
- Use type
- Open item
- Confidence
- Open
- Page / table / figure
- SourceRegister_01 / CitationControl_34
- Notes
- Need cedar/acacia/tamarisk/sycamore/palm suitability, member sizes, reject rates, cut loss, handling loss.
OPEN-TIMBER-PROCUREMENT-LABOR Unresolved evidence requirement — Timber procurement/fabrication/transport labor
- Input / variable
- Timber procurement/fabrication/transport labor
- Source / author
- Open model item
- Year
- n/a
- Value used
- TBD
- Use type
- Open item
- Confidence
- Open
- Page / table / figure
- PersonCategoryMatrix_22 / WaterFeedback_21 / FoodFeedback_28
- Notes
- Woodcutters/import crews, carpenters, haulers, repair crews, boat/harbor handlers require roster/household/support feedback before M3.
OPEN-TIMBER-BOAT-RECURSION Unresolved evidence requirement — Timber transport boat/harbor recursion
- Input / variable
- Timber transport boat/harbor recursion
- Source / author
- Open model item
- Year
- n/a
- Value used
- TBD
- Use type
- Open item
- Confidence
- Open
- Page / table / figure
- Future river/harbor module
- Notes
- Structural timber procurement may require boats/harbor/repair timber and creates a feedback dependency.
SRC-METHOD-RAMP-DIAG Internal method / governance reference — Internal diagnostic method
- Input / variable
- Internal diagnostic method
- Source / author
- 2026
- Year
- Ramp material/traffic/removal diagnostic
- Value used
- Volume screens + material mass + construction/maintenance/removal labor + diagnostic population
- Use type
- Makes pending ramp-system burden visible
- Confidence
- Internal method; source/geometry gaps remain open
- Page / table / figure
- RampSystem_32
- Notes
- v0.44 diagnostic only; not a selected historical ramp reconstruction.
OPEN-RAMP-MATERIAL Unresolved evidence requirement — Ramp material source / placement method
- Input / variable
- Ramp material source / placement method
- Source / author
- Open model item
- Year
- n/a
- Value used
- TBD
- Use type
- Open item
- Confidence
- Open
- Page / table / figure
- RampSystem_32 A114:G126
- Notes
- Need material source, extraction, hauling, placement, compaction, stabilization, and double-spend treatment.
OPEN-RAMP-SURFACE Unresolved evidence requirement — Ramp/track surface maintenance method
- Input / variable
- Ramp/track surface maintenance method
- Source / author
- Open model item
- Year
- n/a
- Value used
- TBD
- Use type
- Open item
- Confidence
- Open
- Page / table / figure
- RampSystem_32 / TimberSystem_31 / RouteCapacity_12
- Notes
- Bare surface, wet surface, planking, paving, sleepers, mats, drainage, rut repair, and disruption need selected treatment.
OPEN-RAMP-REMOVAL Unresolved evidence requirement — Ramp removal / cutback / rework / final-access phasing
- Input / variable
- Ramp removal / cutback / rework / final-access phasing
- Source / author
- Open model item
- Year
- n/a
- Value used
- TBD
- Use type
- Open item
- Confidence
- Open
- Page / table / figure
- RampSystem_32 A102:G104 / A114:G126
- Notes
- Define whether ramp remains, is absorbed, is cut back, is removed, or is reconfigured during casing/final access.
OPEN-RAMP-PERSON-FEEDBACK Unresolved evidence requirement — Ramp crews person-category and support feedback
- Input / variable
- Ramp crews person-category and support feedback
- Source / author
- Open model item
- Year
- n/a
- Value used
- TBD
- Use type
- Open item
- Confidence
- Open
- Page / table / figure
- PersonCategoryMatrix_22 / WaterFeedback_21 / FoodFeedback_28
- Notes
- Ramp builders, maintainers, material handlers, traffic crews, and removal crews need roster, households, water, food, sanitation, processing, and administration before M3.
OPEN-RAMP-TRAFFIC-MODEL Unresolved evidence requirement — Ramp route traffic and staging model
- Input / variable
- Ramp route traffic and staging model
- Source / author
- Open model item
- Year
- n/a
- Value used
- TBD
- Use type
- Open item
- Confidence
- Open
- Page / table / figure
- RouteCapacity_12 / RampSystem_32
- Notes
- Need lane width, passing/return paths, staging, repair stops, turns, upper-course congestion, and simultaneous-team operations.
SRC-METHOD-RAMP-READINESS Internal method / governance reference — Internal integration gate
- Input / variable
- Internal integration gate
- Source / author
- 2026
- Year
- RampSystem_32 M3-readiness review
- Value used
- Diagnostic quantified; integration rejected pending gates
- Use type
- Prevents premature M3 integration
- Confidence
- Internal control
- Page / table / figure
- RampSystem_32 A114:G126
- Notes
- v0.44 control only; no headline model-value change.
SRC-METHOD-DIAG-INTEGRATION Internal method / governance reference — Diagnostic integration governance
- Input / variable
- Diagnostic integration governance
- Source / author
- Internal model-control rule
- Year
- 2026
- Value used
- DiagnosticIntegration_35 roll-up / readiness matrix
- Use type
- Methodology
- Confidence
- High
- Page / table / figure
- Internal QA
- Notes
- Diagnostic burdens are not additive headline totals; M3 entry requires readiness gates and feedback treatment.
SRC-METHOD-MODEL-ANCHORS Internal method / governance reference — Compatibility-safe canonical value table
- Input / variable
- Compatibility-safe canonical value table
- Source / author
- Internal model-control rule
- Year
- 2026
- Value used
- ModelAnchors_36
- Use type
- Cross-sheet reference hardening
- Confidence
- Internal control
- Page / table / figure
- ModelAnchors_36
- Notes
- Visible anchors favored over broad named-range conversion until Numbers round-trip behavior is proven.
SRC-METHOD-COMPAT-GATE Internal method / governance reference — Excel/Numbers compatibility and external integrity gate
- Input / variable
- Excel/Numbers compatibility and external integrity gate
- Source / author
- Internal model-control rule
- Year
- 2026
- Value used
- CompatibilityControl_37
- Use type
- Canonization control
- Confidence
- Internal control
- Page / table / figure
- CompatibilityControl_37
- Notes
- Round-tripped files require external error-token scan before canonization.
SRC-METHOD-STATUS-BASIS Internal method / governance reference — Status basis tags
- Input / variable
- Status basis tags
- Source / author
- Internal model-control rule
- Year
- 2026
- Value used
- LIVE / POLICY / MANUAL(date) / EXTERNAL(date)
- Use type
- Prevents hardcoded status sprawl
- Confidence
- Internal control
- Page / table / figure
- QAChecks_08 / CompatibilityControl_37
- Notes
- Status cells must disclose whether they are live, policy, manual review, or external scan result.
SRC-METHOD-SHEET-NAMES Internal method / governance reference — Sheet-name compatibility rule
- Input / variable
- Sheet-name compatibility rule
- Source / author
- Internal model-control rule
- Year
- 2026
- Value used
- ≤28 characters
- Use type
- Excel/Numbers name-drift prevention
- Confidence
- Internal control
- Page / table / figure
- CompatibilityControl_37
- Notes
- Long water-infrastructure sheet renamed WaterInfraAlt_27.
SRC-WENI-LEVY External or cited source — Maximum documented OK mobilization
- Input / variable
- Maximum documented OK mobilization
- Source / author
- Autobiography of Weni, 6th Dyn tomb inscription, Abydos (Lichtheim, Ancient Egyptian Literature Vol. I)
- Year
- c. 2300 BC
- Value used
- 'army of many tens of thousands', levied 5x
- Use type
- Comparator
- Confidence
- Medium
- Page / table / figure
- Lichtheim, AEL Vol. I, pp. 18-23 (The Autobiography of Weni) - verify against physical copy
SRC-PALERMO-SNEFRU External or cited source — OK military character (expeditionary levies)
- Input / variable
- OK military character (expeditionary levies)
- Source / author
- Palermo Stone royal annals, Snefru register (Wilkinson, Royal Annals of Ancient Egypt, 2000)
- Year
- c. 2600 BC
- Value used
- 7,000 Nubian captives, 200,000 cattle; temporary levies, no standing army
- Use type
- Context
- Confidence
- Medium
- Page / table / figure
- Wilkinson 2000, PS recto Snefru register (r.VI); translation section pp. 85ff - verify compartment against physical copy
SRC-MERER External or cited source — River transport operations anchor
- Input / variable
- River transport operations anchor
- Source / author
- Diary of Merer, Papyrus Jarf A/B, Wadi al-Jarf (Tallet, Les Papyrus de la Mer Rouge I, 2017)
- Year
- c. 2560 BC
- Value used
- 40-man phyle in ~200-man gang (pp. 15-17; log validation pp. 40-41, Sections AII, BI-II); 2-3 round trips/10-day week (pp. 23-25); ~70-80 t loads, 10-15 blocks x 2-3 t (pp. 25-26); 5-month window. All sight-verified 2026-07-11. English secondary: Tallet & Lehner 2022, The Red Sea Scrolls; harbor terms: Lehner 2020, "Merer and the Sphinx," Guardian of Ancient Egypt II, pp. 895-925
- Use type
- Direct
- Confidence
- High
- Page / table / figure
- Tallet 2017, Papyrus Jarf A/B - page verification OPEN ITEM
SRC-MALE-COHORT External or cited source — Working-age physically fit male cohort share
- Input / variable
- Working-age physically fit male cohort share
- Source / author
- Demographic synthesis - model life tables for high-mortality agrarian populations; no single source
- Year
- n/a
- Value used
- 0.24 of total population (~0.50 male x ~0.48 working-age-fit) - ASSUMPTION, taken high; sensitivity 20-30% in ClosureSensitivity_45
- Use type
- Lever / denominator basis
- Confidence
- Medium
- Page / table / figure
- OPEN ITEM - requires citation hardening (model life table or published OK demographic estimate)
- Notes
- Ruling 2026-07-10 fixes this as the prime-age male cohort used by both NationalClosure_41 Test 1 and DemographicClosure_46. Sex-neutral "able-bodied" labels corrected in v0.66. Numerator is male-scoped, so the denominator is male-scoped.
SRC-CEDAR-PROCESSING-STATE External or cited source — Processing state of imported Old Kingdom cedar at delivery
- Input / variable
- Processing state of imported Old Kingdom cedar at delivery
- Source / author
- Palermo Stone entry (Wilkinson, Royal Annals, 2000, pp. 141-145) records ships of cedar wood without specifying processing state. Survey targets for the source-side capacity question: Mumford, Egypt in the Eastern Mediterranean during the Old Kingdom: An Archaeological Perspective; Francis-Allouche & Grimal, "The Maritime Approaches to Ancient Byblos (Lebanon)", JEMAHS 4:2-3 (2016), 242-277. Reading caveat: Scalf, "Rereading the 7th Count of Snefru in the Palermo Stone", GM 220 (2009), notes the initial column is difficult and has drawn various interpretations.
- Year
- c. 2600 BC (record); modern surveys
- Value used
- UNATTESTED - no source-side conversion installation is reported in the sources surveyed to date; primary reading task open. Supports MR-07 leg 2. Counter-datapoint: Wenamun (New Kingdom, ~1100 BC) describes timber supplied as stem-posts and keels.
- Use type
- Ruling support / comparator basis
- Confidence
- Low
SRC-BANK-BEARING External or cited source — Allowable bearing capacity at the Giza delivery-end transfer (floodplain / harbor basin)
- Input / variable
- Allowable bearing capacity at the Giza delivery-end transfer (floodplain / harbor basin)
- Source / author
- OPEN - no source pinned. Value 15,000 kg/m2 (~147 kPa) sits at the generous end of published soft-saturated-soil ranges. Scope narrowed to the Giza delivery end in v0.72 per ruling MR-03: Aswan is First Cataract granite bedrock and is not described by this lever. Target: a geotechnical reference for Nile floodplain alluvium, plus the Giza harbor literature on whether the delivery-end transfer point was a prepared or built surface.
- Year
- n/a
- Value used
- 15,000 kg/m2 - ASSUMPTION, taken high (favourable to the conventional scenario). Was badged SOURCE without a register entry until v0.71; badge corrected. Scope corrected in v0.72 - value unchanged.
- Use type
- Lever / Gate 3 denominator
- Confidence
- Low
SRC-BARGE-DIMENSIONS External or cited source — Hull dimensions of a heavy granite-carrying barge
- Input / variable
- Hull dimensions of a heavy granite-carrying barge
- Source / author
- OPEN - no Old Kingdom heavy-cargo hull is attested with dimensions. Working comparator is the New Kingdom Hatshepsut obelisk barge, roughly 63 x 21 m in the common reconstruction, which is itself contested and is a thousand years later than the Khufu reign. Targets: Naville, Deir el-Bahari; Landstrom, Ships of the Pharaohs; the Khufu ship publication for Old Kingdom hull construction limits.
- Year
- n/a
- Value used
- 60 x 13 m modelled (Inputs_03!B197/B198) - ASSUMPTION, taken generous. A LARGER hull reduces deck movement and favours the conventional scenario, so the comparator is used as a magnitude, never a ceiling.
- Use type
- Lever / Gate 4b transfer stability
- Confidence
- Low
SRC-TIMBER-USECLASS External or cited source — Imported vs native share of structural timber by use class
- Input / variable
- Imported vs native share of structural timber by use class
- Source / author
- OPEN - the model carries a single 50% imported share (Inputs_03!B180) across all timber. Egypt lacks structural softwood, so structural-grade members are the imported stream while sledges, cribbing and shuttering could plausibly be native acacia. Targets: Old Kingdom carpentry and timber-species studies; Khufu ship publication for species by component.
- Year
- n/a
- Value used
- 0.50 flat - ASSUMPTION, generous to the conventional account. A higher structural-import share raises the literal cedar requirement.
- Use type
- Lever / timber import basis
- Confidence
- Low
SRC-GRANITE-MASS External or cited source — Total Aswan granite mass in the Great Pyramid
- Input / variable
- Total Aswan granite mass in the Great Pyramid
- Source / author
- Hemeda, S. & Sonbol, A. (2020). "Sustainability problems of the Giza pyramids." Heritage Science 8:8, p.2: "8000 tons of granite were imported from Aswan located at more than 800 km away... The largest granite stones in the pyramid, found above the King's chamber, weigh 25 to 80 tons each." Repeated by Scheuring (2025), npj Heritage Science 13:473, ~3,000 m3 / 8,000 t, citing Hemeda & Sonbol - a secondary publication of the same estimate, not independent corroboration.
- Year
- 2020
- Value used
- 8,000 t (SOURCED). A stated figure in a geotechnical paper, unreferenced and underived - registered Medium, not High. Governs the mass-transport block at GraniteAswan_42 rows 57-82; the 30-piece heavy-load subset is inside it.
- Use type
- Load basis / mass-transport throughput
- Confidence
- Medium
SRC-ASWAN-CORRIDOR External or cited source — Aswan-Giza river corridor distance
- Input / variable
- Aswan-Giza river corridor distance
- Source / author
- Geographic measurement of the Nile course between the Aswan granite quarries and the Giza harbour basin. Corroborated in the granite literature: Hemeda & Sonbol (2020), Heritage Science 8:8, p.2 place Aswan "more than 800 km away" (registered as SRC-GRANITE-MASS).
- Year
- n/a
- Value used
- 890 km each way (Inputs_03!B193; Assumptions_02 row 94). A geographic constant, not a lever: DEFAULT, CONSERVATIVE and STEELMAN all carry 890. Distinct from the overland quarry-to-riverbank leg at Inputs_03!B189.
- Use type
- Corridor distance / round-trip duration
- Confidence
- High
- Page / table / figure
- Hemeda & Sonbol 2020 p.2 for the >800 km corroboration
- Notes
- Split from SRC-MERER in v0.86 (ruling MR-16). Merer documents the Tura-Giza run of ~17 km and Red Sea operations from Wadi al-Jarf; it does not measure the Aswan corridor. SRC-MERER continues to carry the phyle size, gang structure, cadence, documented boat load and the 150-day window.
SRC-BASINDIST External or cited source — Carry distance, harbour basin to pyramid base (avg)
- Input / variable
- Carry distance, harbour basin to pyramid base (avg)
- Source / author
- No publication was found, in the sources reviewed for this model, that states how the workforce's water was supplied - no Old Kingdom well, cistern, or water-supply installation serving the Giza workforce, and none identifying the harbour basin as the supply point. The basin's position at the foot of the plateau IS published and independently corroborated (SRC-LAKE-KHUFU, Lehner 2020; Sheisha et al., PNAS 119, 2022). The 900 m is a geographic measurement anchored on that published basin geometry, not a figure taken from any source.
- Year
- n/a
- Value used
- 900 m - ASSUMPTION, anchored measurement. STEELMAN mode carries 600 m, which is a generosity bracket rather than a measured alternative distance.
- Use type
- Lever / carrier trip-cycle distance
- Confidence
- Low
- Page / table / figure
- n/a - no publication states this distance, so no page is owed on this row. Basin-position provenance sits with SRC-LAKE-KHUFU, whose page item is open on its own row.
- Notes
- Feeds the carrier trip cycle at Model_04 B76/C76/D76 and nothing else. The vertical leg of the same route is SRC-PLATEAULIFT. REVERSAL CONDITION: if an Old Kingdom water source nearer the base is published, the carry distance falls and this input should be re-run at that distance. Deliberately NOT exposed as a public lever (owner ruling 2026-09-03) - varying it would be a hypothetical unsupported variable. Claims that closer water reduces this burden are handled at WaterInfraAlt_27 rows 29-30 and paper section 7.2: the replacement system must carry its own excavation, lining, maintenance, evidence and feedback burden before it reduces the carrier total.
SRC-SINAI-OVERHEAD External or cited source — Sinai expedition overhead ratio (support personnel per miner)
- Input / variable
- Sinai expedition overhead ratio (support personnel per miner)
- Source / author
- Not a sourced ratio and not an estimate of actual overhead. Old Kingdom Sinai expedition inscriptions record parties of several hundred with miners a fraction of the party, indicating overhead well above 1:1; no single publication is pinned. The 1:1 is a declared cap.
- Year
- n/a
- Value used
- 1.0 support person per miner - ASSUMPTION, generous. Overhead beyond 1:1 is excluded by declaration at Exclusions_11 row 19 ('Security/garrison; Sinai expedition overhead beyond 1:1', partially priced, 'Only selected expedition overhead is included').
- Use type
- Lever / expedition overhead basis
- Confidence
- Low
- Page / table / figure
- OPEN ITEM - inscriptional corroboration not page-pinned.
- Notes
- Feeds Model_04 B55 (expedition overhead: soldiers, admin, camp). Paper section 7.10 reports 70 miners and 70 overhead. Because the excess is excluded rather than estimated, the model UNDERSTATES expedition burden by construction.
SRC-FESTIVAL External or cited source — Annual leave + festival days
- Input / variable
- Annual leave + festival days
- Source / author
- Not a single-source figure. Composed from modern regional labour practice plus documented Old Kingdom festival observance. Modern side pinned 2026-09-03 to Egyptian Labour Law No. 12 of 2003: 21 working days paid annual leave after one year of service, rising to 30 days at age 50 or after ten years' service, with official public holidays separate and capped at 13 days a year (Minister of Manpower and Immigration Decision No. 112 of 2003, amended by Decision No. 49 of 2009). Statutory modern time off is therefore ~34 days minimum and ~43 days for a long-service worker. Ancient calendar corroboration at SRC-CALENDAR (Deir el-Medina ostraca: 10-day week, rest days, absences).
- Year
- 2003
- Value used
- 40 days/yr - ASSUMPTION, planning value. Sits inside the modern Egyptian statutory range (34-43), so it is close to the modern norm rather than an inflated figure. STEELMAN mode carries 30, which is BELOW the modern statutory minimum and therefore concedes more than modern practice would give.
- Use type
- Lever / workforce availability basis
- Confidence
- Medium
- Page / table / figure
- Egyptian Labour Law No. 12 of 2003, annual-leave provisions; Ministerial Decision No. 112 of 2003 for the public-holiday cap. NOT SIGHT-VERIFIED against the statute text - taken from secondary summaries of the law, 2026-09-03. Pin task: confirm article numbers against the primary text.
- Notes
- Feeds Model_04 row 109 (leave + festival + disruption days) and the effective delivery figure at row 111. METHOD: availability is floored at documented modern regional labour practice; assuming ancient labour exceeded modern availability requires justification (Objections_10 row 12). Paper section 12 records the floor as a disclosed concession independently corroborated by the IER study's 10-hour, 6-day calendar (SRC-ROSELLROIG-IER). The corroboration attaches to the floor; the 40 is the planning value above it. NOTE: the workbook note on the input says '~30 days off/yr' for modern practice, which understates the statutory minimum of ~34.
SRC-SICKINJURY External or cited source — Sick/injury absence rate
- Input / variable
- Sick/injury absence rate
- Source / author
- The rate itself is not published. Giza worker-cemetery pathology IS sourced - 67% healed fractures, 75%+ arthritis - and indicates morbidity well above a modern floor; provenance shared with SRC-MORTALITY (Hawass workers' cemetery report; Sarry El-Din 2003). The 8% is a modern floor applied against that evidence.
- Year
- n/a
- Value used
- 0.08 - ASSUMPTION, generous. Disabling injury is excluded from the replacement multiplier entirely (Model_04 row 113, 'Disabling injury excluded - generous'), and medical support labour is unpriced (Exclusions_11 row 17).
- Use type
- Lever / attendance basis
- Confidence
- Medium/Low
- Page / table / figure
- No publication states an absence rate, so no page is owed for the rate. Pathology provenance sits with SRC-MORTALITY, which is page-pinned and sight-verified.
- Notes
- Feeds the attendance factor at Model_04 row 110. Paper section 12 records the injury exclusion as a concession. DIRECTION: the sourced pathology points to higher absence than 8%, so the modern floor understates the burden.
SRC-ENTRYAGE External or cited source — Workforce entry age
- Input / variable
- Workforce entry age
- Source / author
- Not a sourced figure. Entry age is a concession. The 3,000 reference pool was derived on an adult-entry basis of 20 (Inputs_03 B89), and granting entry at 15 rescales the pool across the wider working band to 4,200 (Inputs_03 B31 = 3,000 x (32.5 - 15) / (32.5 - 20)). Reference-pool provenance is JUDG-LABORPOOL-REF, which records it as generous to the conventional account and not sourced.
- Year
- n/a
- Value used
- 15 - ASSUMPTION, concession granting full adult output at entry. Widens the effective labour pool from the 3,000 reference to the 4,200 adjusted pool, which favours the conventional account. Sensitivity 15/18/20 recorded on the input.
- Use type
- Lever / labour-pool scaling basis
- Confidence
- Low
- Page / table / figure
- n/a - no publication is claimed and none is owed. This is a declared concession, not a sourced value.
- Notes
- Granted in answer to the objection 'Children performed support roles' (Objections_10 row 13): carrier load scales with body mass, so the concession INCREASES required headcount. Replacement multiplier is DERIVED from this and cemetery mortality (Model_04 rows 112-113). The reference-versus-adjusted pool distinction is guarded at QAChecks_08 row 9 and Objections_10 row 16.